FactoryAuditB2B
Post an RFQ
Inspection

Label defect stopped before container loading

Updated: 2026-08-31

Illustrative examples based on common buyer scenarios. These are anonymised method walk-throughs, not client testimonials.

A 12,000-unit order was inspected at 90 percent packing. AQL sampling found a critical country-of-origin labelling error above the reject threshold, and the batch was reworked before loading.

Problem

The shipment had a tight vessel cut-off. The buyer booked a pre-shipment inspection at 90 percent packing so there was still time to hold or fix the batch.

Investigation

  1. 1. Agreed the AQL level and sample size before the inspection.
  2. 2. Counted quantity and tested function on the sampled units.
  3. 3. Verified packing and labelling against the purchase order and the market requirement.
  4. 4. Found the country-of-origin mark incorrect on more units than the AQL accept number allowed.

Findings

The batch was reworked before container loading, re-inspected and passed, and the shipment sailed on schedule instead of being rejected at customs.

  • ·Country-of-origin mark was incorrect on more units than the AQL accept number allowed.
  • ·Quantity and function tests passed on the sampled units.
  • ·The defect was a labelling error rather than a product failure, and could be reworked.

Risk score

62/ 100 · ELEVATED

Indicative score before the work described above. Higher score means lower risk. This is an illustrative figure for the example, not a real verification result.

Recommendation

Rework the labelling, re-inspect before loading, and add an artwork approval step to the next order.

Related guides

Need this done for your supplier?

Send your requirement and we will scope the verification, audit or inspection for your product and market.

Label defect stopped before container loading | FactoryAuditB2B